Cases 101 - 110 of 123
Adams v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00735
Plaintiff:
Scott Adams
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Bruce Lemon, William Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
GLASCO v. MCKINNEY et al
as 1:2012cv01570
Defendant:
Nurse DILLOW, Captain MCKINNEY, Doctor NELSON and others
Plaintiff:
CONZALOS GLASCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
TROUTMAN v. SMITH
as 1:2012cv01505
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE OF INDIANA and BRIAN SMITH
Petitioner:
NELSON TROUTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEAL v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2012cv00298
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, CHARLES L. LOCKETT, AMBER L. NELSON and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
MORRIS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2012cv01207
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, ANDY DUNIGAN, CRYSTAL HOTTMAN and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00096
Defendant:
D. BURKS, J. CRUZ, CAPTAIN JOYNER and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MOON v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00072
Defendant:
V. BOYER, LIEUTENANT BRACE, HARVEY G. CHURCH and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NELSON v. OLIVER
as 2:2011cv00238
Petitioner:
DAVID J. NELSON
Respondent:
JOHN OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NELSON v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00209
Defendant:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL and DAVID J. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEAL v. BRIGGS
as 2:2011cv00184
Defendant:
LAURA A. BRIGGS
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL and DAVID J. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
