Cases 111 - 120 of 129
MORRIS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2012cv01207
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, ANDY DUNIGAN, CRYSTAL HOTTMAN and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00096
Defendant:
D. BURKS, J. CRUZ, CAPTAIN JOYNER and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MOON v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00072
Defendant:
V. BOYER, LIEUTENANT BRACE, HARVEY G. CHURCH and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NELSON v. OLIVER
as 2:2011cv00238
Petitioner:
DAVID J. NELSON
Respondent:
JOHN OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NELSON v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00209
Defendant:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL and DAVID J. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEAL v. BRIGGS
as 2:2011cv00184
Defendant:
LAURA A. BRIGGS
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL and DAVID J. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NELSON v. PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2011cv00157
Petitioner:
JAMES A. NELSON
Respondent:
PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEAL v LOCKETT
as 1:2011cv00415
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Petitioner:
DAVID J. NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SPINKS v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2010cv01558
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, A. DUNNIGAN, DR. GILLIAN and others
Plaintiff:
KELLY J. SPRINKS, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIOS v. CARNEYGEE et al
as 1:2010cv01421
Defendant:
SUPT DONNA CARNEYGEE and OFFICER FRANKHAUSER
Plaintiff:
NELSON RIOS, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
