Cases 151 - 160 of 245
SCROGGINS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 3:2012cv00113
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
PERRY M. SCROGGINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2012cv00192
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. COLE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BLANCHARD v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2012cv00185
Plaintiff:
RAY BLANCHARD
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
TRAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2012cv00147
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
TUNG TRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GREATHOUSE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2012cv00148
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GREATHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PAUL v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2012cv00143
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY W. PAUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MIRELES v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2012cv00125
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
CESAR ENRIQUE MIRELES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PAUL v. THE BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.
as 2:2012cv00120
Defendant:
CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA:TERRE HAUTE INDIANA and THE BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DE LA CRUZ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2012cv00113
Plaintiff:
RICARDO DE LA CRUZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HANSEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2012cv00036
Defendant:
R BRANDENBURG, P DUNCAN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT KELLY HANSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
