Cases 11 - 20 of 289
Bailey v. Adams et al
as 1:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
Victor V. Bailey
Defendant:
Warden Adams, Will County Adult Detention Facility, Ameasha Randles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Truit et al
as 1:2023cv01149
Plaintiff:
Donzell Lowe
Defendant:
Charles Truit, Kenneth Osborne, Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Brown et al
as 4:2023cv04030
Plaintiff:
Demario Demorya Williams and Demetrus Williams
Defendant:
. Brown, C Young, . Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamz v. L.t Brown et al
as 1:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Demario Demorya Williamz
Defendant:
L.t Brown, C. Young, Sgt. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Truitt et al
as 1:2022cv06582
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Bailey
Defendant:
Warden Charles Truitt, Vicki Dunlap and F. Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Truitt et al
as 1:2022cv06472
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Bailey
Defendant:
Charles Truitt, Vicki Dunlap and F. Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ocampo v. Wahl et al
as 1:2022cv01306
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ocampo
Defendant:
A Wahl, . Strutmier, . Grobe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv50313
Plaintiff:
Taijay Todd
Defendant:
United States, Grisom and Megan Verry-Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Joiner et al
as 1:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Joseph Murphy
Defendant:
Katina L Joiner, Michelle Howell, . Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Wills
as 1:2022cv01255
Petitioner:
Theodore Bailey
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
