Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 27
BRIGHT v. SMITH
as 2:2017cv00385
Petitioner: TONY BRIGHT
Miscellaneou: PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent: BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson, Sr. v. Bukowski et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv02050
Plaintiff: Brandon Deonte Jackson, Sr.
Defendant: Timothy F Bukowski, Chad Kolitwenzew, Robert Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2015cv02197
Plaintiff: LaMarcus Washington
Defendant: Chad Kolitwenzew, . Bright, . Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Downey et al
as 2:2015cv02045
Plaintiff: Javon E Johnson
Defendant: Michael D. Downey, Chad Kolitwenzew, Crystal Krumwiede and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Bright et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02146
Plaintiff: Curtis J Edwards
Defendant: M Bright, M Villafuerte, Michael D Downey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Chief Downey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv02268
Plaintiff: Mike D Russell
Defendant: Downey, Kolowenzew, Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bright v. Brown et al
as 1:2013cv08639
Plaintiff: Wardell Bright
Defendant: Danney Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wardell Bright v. Ramon Melendez, et al
as 12-3405
Plaintiff - Appellant: WARDELL BRIGHT, also known as Wydell Bright
Defendant - Appellee: RAMON MELENDEZ, #11398 and RODRIGO CORONA, #7852
Rodney Bright v. Becky Sudrink, et al
as 12-1857
Plaintiff - Appellant: RODNEY BRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee: BECKY SUDRINK, D. WILLIAMS, Doctor and KIRCHNER, Assistant Warden
Rodney Bright v. Danville Correctional Center
as 12-1284
Plaintiff - Appellant: RODNEY EUGENE BRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee: DANVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?