Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Porter, Brandon et al v. Miesner, M. et al
as 3:2017cv00726
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Porter
Defendant:
M. Miesner , J. Nickel, Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooper v. Miller
as 2:2017cv02023
Plaintiff:
George L Hooper
Defendant:
Mary Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOOPER v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2016cv00151
Defendant:
COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH and STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
BRYANT HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter, Tommie v. Hooper, Patrick et al
as 3:2016cv00054
Plaintiff:
Tommie L. Carter
Defendant:
Patrick C. Hooper and Brent H. Exner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUNSTILL v. BURCH
as 1:2014cv00916
Respondent:
DAVID BURCH, CRIMINAL COURT F25, DAVID M HOOPER and others
Petitioner:
JOSEPH D TUNSTILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowe, Michael v. Trish et al
as 3:2014cv00195
Plaintiff:
Michael Cortez Rowe
Defendant:
Trish , Martin , Heinzyl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis, Jeffrey v. Schneider et al
as 3:2013cv00842
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Schneider , Bartz, Haag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANKH EL et al v. HILL et al
as 1:2013cv01471
Defendant:
M. ADDINGTON, ROBERT R. ALTICE, AMY BARBAR and others
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH EL and TYREESE TAYLOR-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis, Jeffrey v. Laurent, Dawn et al
as 3:2013cv00467
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Dawn Laurent , Nicholas Buhr, Marcelo Trinidad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. HILL et al
as 1:2013cv00617
Petitioner:
GREGORY J. DAVIS
Respondent:
RUBEN HILL, Prosecutor TOM HIRSCHAUER, DAVID HOOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
