Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Mays v. Alverez et al
as 1:2012cv01404
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mays
Defendant:
Anita Alverez, Lisa Madigan, J Jesse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Shah et al
as 3:2010cv03153
Plaintiff:
Donchii Malone
Defendant:
Yipin Shah, Lowel Brown, Daniel Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Shah et al
as 1:2010cv01203
Plaintiff:
Donchii Malone
Defendant:
Yipin Shah, Lowel Brown, Daniel Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Rios et al
as 1:2010cv01178
Plaintiff:
George Banks
Defendant:
Ricardo Rios, . Jones, . Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Conley v. Anglin et al
as 1:2010cv01002
Plaintiff:
Anthony Conley
Defendant:
Keith Anglin, Mary Miller, Tina Last name unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. Anglin et al
as 2:2010cv02013
Plaintiff:
Anthony Conley
Defendant:
Keith Anglin, Mary Miller, Tina Last name unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radley v. Thomas et al
as 3:2009cv00579
Plaintiff:
James Radley
Defendant:
Tiara Thomas, Connie Melnyczenko, L East and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forest v. Peoria County Jail et al
as 1:2009cv01026
Plaintiff:
Fred Forest
Defendant:
Peoria County Jail, Michael D McCoy, Steven . Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Witherspoon et al
as 1:2008cv01701
Plaintiff:
Marcus Brown
Defendant:
Jennifer Witherspoon, Patrick Firman, Anthony Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCINTOSH SR v. THE ADMIN. OF THE JEFFERSON CO. SHERIFF'S DEPT. et al
as 4:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
CARLTON EVAN MCINTOSH SR
Defendant:
THE ADMIN. OF THE JEFFERSON CO. SHERIFF'S DEPT., WILLIAM BILL ANDREWS, KEN BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
