Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Werchowski v. Probation and Parole Office
as 2:2018cv01149
Plaintiff:
Dennis Werchowsle and Dennis Werchowski
Defendant:
Probation and Parole Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
London v. State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv00889
Plaintiff:
Keith London
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections , State of Wisconsin Probation and Parole Commission, Jim Schwochert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman, Timothy v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00466
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coleman
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Huber et al
as 2:2014cv00756
Plaintiff:
Terry Jackson
Defendant:
Greg Huber, Russell Van Skike, Kurt Klomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hiland v. Wisconsin Department of Probation and Parole
as 1:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hiland
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections Division of Community Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ramon Ashly Williams
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections Division of Community Corrections , DOC Department of Probation and Parole, Mark Kautzmann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Blackmon v. Ruth Donalds, et al
as 13-1965
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. BLACKMON
Defendant - Appellee:
RUTH DONALDS, probation and parole supervisor, ROBYN ERICKSON and JACQUELINE GATLIN
Dana Morse v. Michele Krueger
as 09-1046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANA MORSE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELE KRUEGER, Probation and Parole Agent
Robenhorst v. Schrader et al
as 1:2007cv00094
Plaintiff:
Timothy R Robenhorst
Defendant:
Karen Schrader, Aaron Sabel and Wisconsin Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
