Cases 11 - 20 of 126
Roman v. Buffor et al
as 1:2023cv01144
Plaintiff:
Luis Roman
Defendant:
. Buffor, Zacarias, . Durre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRENCH v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2022cv00547
Plaintiff:
ROMAN L FRENCH and ROMAN LAMONT FRENCH
Defendant:
WARDEN, BYRD, KIM HOBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRENCH v. VOIGHTSCHILD et al
as 2:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
ROMAN L FRENCH and ROMAN FRENCH
Defendant:
M VOIGHTSCHILD, EWERS, PARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Warden et al
as 3:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Roman L French and Roman Lamont French
Defendant:
Warden, Byrd, Kim Hobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Voightschild et al
as 3:2022cv00967
Plaintiff:
Roman L French and Roman French
Defendant:
M Voightschild, Ewers, Parr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Bennett et al
as 3:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
Roman L French and Roman French
Defendant:
Robert Bennett, Michael Gapski and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARNER v. MCNAIRY COUNTY COURT et al
as 1:2022cv01755
Petitioner:
ROMAN E. WARNER
Respondent:
MCNAIRY COUNTY COURT, STATE OF TENNESSEE and REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. USA
as 2:2022cv00231
Petitioner:
Rafael Roman Ramirez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robert Alexander v. Nathan Tapio, et al
as 22-1650
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT E. ALEXANDER
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHAN TAPIO and ROMAN Y. KAPLAN
Moody v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv01496
Plaintiff:
Zeron Moody
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Roman and Weedman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
