Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00942
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Jean et al
as 1:2019cv00200
Defendant:
Tom Mayes, Chief of Police, David Glickfield and others
Plaintiff:
Fernando Hernandez Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pond v. Zigler et al
as 1:2019cv00198
Defendant:
Chief of Police, Mayor, Jeffrey Todd and others
Plaintiff:
Dakota Q Pond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wortman v. Chief of Police et al
as 2:2018cv01407
Defendant:
Adrianne Moore, Christopher Schmaling and Chief of Police
Plaintiff:
Daniel Karl Wortman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
French v. Chief of Police et al
as 1:2017cv03662
Plaintiff:
Shamus L. French
Defendant:
Chief of Police, Lt. Baugh, Off. Sitkaukas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. The "Chief" of Police (Or Commander) et al
as 1:2016cv06889
Plaintiff:
Randall W. Brown
Defendant:
The "Chief" of Police (Or Commander) and An "unknown-by-name" Summit Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Hoffman v. Wood River Police Department, et al
as 16-1894
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID L. HOFFMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WOOD RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT, OTIS STEWARD, Chief of Police, Wood River, Illinois, BRADY GREENE, Narcotics Detective, Wood River P.D. and others
Hill-Bey v. United States et al
as 1:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
Danny Hill-Bey
Defendant:
United States, Wayne Seybold, Scott Haley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tommy Webster v. Office of the United States, et al
as 16-1180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY WEBSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, FRANK E. SCHAFFER, Assistant United States Attorney, SCOTT RUSZKOWSKI, South Bend Chief of Police and others
Mark Johnson v. Officer Story, et al
as 15-3534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK H. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER STORY, OFFICER ZIEMBO, JOHN DOE 1, Chief of Police and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
