Cases 21 - 30 of 123
Gamez v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2022cv01426
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gamez
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Gomez and . Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Illinois River Correctional Center
as 1:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
Gabriel L Williams
Defendant:
Illinois River Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Featherstun et al
as 1:2022cv01069
Plaintiff:
Gabriel L Williams
Defendant:
Sean Featherstun, Matt Vaughn, Jerry Crisel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gamez v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gamez
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Gomez and . Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Jackson
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Justin Wilks, Warden Dixon Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MCVICKER v. CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv02914
Plaintiff:
STANLEY K. MCVICKER
Defendant:
CITY OF BEDFORD, INDIANA, BEDFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, LAWRENCE COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Brown et al
as 1:2021cv04630
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Parker
Defendant:
David Brown, Unnamed Chicago Police Officer and Unnamed Chicago Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. SPAULDING et al
as 2:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
DEREK THOMAS
Defendant:
COREY POINTER, STEPHEN SPAULDING, JOSLYN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corral v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv01013
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Health Care and C.C.D.O.C.
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Corral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Eaton et al
as 1:2021cv00630
Defendant:
Jeremiah Eaton, Kyle Bledsoe, City Of Joliet and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
