Cases 21 - 30 of 661
Flood v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Patrick Flood and Patrick S Flood
Defendant:
William Hyatte, Joshua Snow, Lorna Harbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Titus v. Officer Thornton, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
ADAM TITUS
Defendant:
OFFICER THORNTON, Placement Officer, JOHN/JANE DOE, Maintenance Supervisor, WARDEN GOMEZ and others
Olden v. Avery et al
as 3:2024cv03079
Plaintiff:
Terrance Olden
Defendant:
Cameron Avery, Scott Jackson, . French and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClendon v. Sankey et al
as 3:2024cv01168
Plaintiff:
Duane McClendon
Defendant:
Shaquille Sankey, John Doe and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Carbondale Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Carbondale Memorial Hospital, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Townsend
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, James D. Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mason v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
Ray Mason
Defendant:
John Doe, Major Matthews, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02215
Plaintiff:
Tirnell Williams
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County Illinois, Klimik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Portee v. Beary et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Portee
Defendant:
May Beary, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
