Cases 21 - 30 of 43
KENDRICK et al v. ABNEY-BROTZ et al
as 1:2017cv03760
Defendant:
ANDREW ABNEY-BROTZ, JEFF CAPPA and CHRIS TOBY
Plaintiff:
JAMES M HARTSFIELD and MARK E. KENDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godfrey v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2017cv03132
Plaintiff:
Toby Godfrey
Defendant:
John . Baldwin, C Watson, . Dannihold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHLUETER v. MATNEY et al
as 1:2017cv01001
Defendant:
TOBY M. COMBEST, TYSON MATNEY and CHAD A. MOORE
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS SCHLUETER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAXWELL v. YORK et al
as 2:2017cv00142
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, K. HOBSEN, KNUST and others
Plaintiff:
TOBY T. MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAXWELL v. RUSSELL et al
as 2:2017cv00048
Defendant:
ALLEN, BENNETT, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
TOBY T. MAXWELL
Miscellaneou:
WVCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Theodore v. Lavene et al
as 3:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Theodore Smith
Defendant:
Lavene , John Doe, Gamboro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins, Donta v. Miller, Captain et al
as 3:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
Donta Jenkins
Defendant:
Captain Miller , J. Gouhde, Lucas Webber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Coe et al
as 3:2016cv01229
Plaintiff:
Damon B. Parks
Defendant:
John Coe, Mrs. Blanchard, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOEL v. CHAPMAN et al
as 1:2015cv01951
Defendant:
ROBERT BUGHER, ALONZO CHAPMAN, DAVID HAMMACK and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NOEL
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godfrey v. Lamb et al
as 1:2015cv10698
Plaintiff:
Toby Godfrey
Defendant:
Acting Warden Lamb, Tracy Engleson, Lieutuant Dunbar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
