Cases 21 - 30 of 32
FERRELL v. FRANCUM et al
as 1:2013cv01875
Plaintiff:
TYLER FERRELL
Defendant:
TOM FRANCUM, SGT. J. SERVIZZI and C/O SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Randale et al
as 3:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wells
Defendant:
Michael P Randale, Donald Gaetz, Assistant Warden Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRELL v. MILLS et al
as 4:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
TYLER FERRELL
Defendant:
SEARGENT DAVID FURMAN, MAJOR STEVE KNIGHT, SHERIFF DARRELL MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Kania et al
as 3:2010cv00506
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen
Defendant:
Lawrence Kania, Lt Ferrell, Charles Parnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRELL v. FLOYD SUPERIOR COURT #1
as 4:2010cv00070
Petitioner:
TYLER S. FERRELL
Respondent:
FLOYD SUPERIOR COURT #1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FERRELL v. KNIGHT et al
as 4:2010cv00058
Plaintiff:
TYLER S. FERRELL
Defendant:
CAPTAIN STEVE KNIGHT and LIEUTENANT ANDREW SANDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Hoskins v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 10-1629
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA HOSKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, JEFFREY FERRELL and others
Joshua Hoskins v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 10-1619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA HOSKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, JEFFREY FERRELL and others
Hoskins v. Dart et al
as 1:2010cv00677
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Salvadore Godinez, Jeffrey Ferrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Dart, et al
as 1:2010cv00705
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Salvador Godinez, Jeffrey Ferrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
