Cases 21 - 30 of 101,300
Ealy v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv04091
Plaintiff:
Courtney Ealy
Defendant:
Sharon Oden Johnson, Micheal Hyman and Sanjay Tailor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Adkins
as 2:2024cv02114
Petitioner:
Juan Ortiz
Respondent:
Felicia Adkins
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tracy v. Nall et al
as 4:2024cv04092
Plaintiff:
Steven Tracy, Jr
Defendant:
. Nall and East Moline Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Marthakis et al
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
James Orlando Washington and James O Washington
Defendant:
Nancy B Marthakis, Centurion Health of Indiana LLC, Ashley Burnham and others
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LILLARD v. RULE et al
as 2:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
COREY LILLARD
Respondent:
T. RULE and WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
RAMON v. HEATHERLY et al
as 1:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
GILBERT RAMON
Defendant:
JESSICA HEATHERLY, PRITCHETT, JUAN COLAZOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
DAMON JAMES
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and BRANCHVILLE INSTITUTION/WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL v. PAYNE et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
QUINYATTE JARMAINE HARRELL
Defendant:
PAYNE and ASHLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alan Wyman v. Christine Brannon-Dortch
as 24-1871
Petitioner:
ALAN WYMAN
Respondent:
CHRISTINE BRANNON-DORTCH, Warden
Mosley v. USA
as 3:2024cv01326
Petitioner:
Danyahle L. Mosley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
