Cases 21 - 30 of 30,411
Larry v. USA
as 1:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Torrence Larry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walton Sr. v. Porter County Jail
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Walton Sr.
Defendant:
Porter County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOPKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00824
Petitioner:
ANTOINE HOPKINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CALLANTINE v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00183
Petitioner:
ZACHARY W. CALLANTINE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCMULLIN v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
SHAWN MCMULLIN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAKER v. ASHONG et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
LINDSEY DIANE BAKER
Defendant:
HELENA ASHONG, HOPE DE KREF, KATHY NICHOLAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holm v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Austin Jeremiah Holm
Defendant:
J Galipeau and Bridegroom
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRENTON v. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MICHAEL BRENTON
Defendant:
QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glassel v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Glassel
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Raccio and Sherri Fritter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Hershberger et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Hogan
Defendant:
Sherrif Hershberger and Pgs - 1 to 9 Names of Staff Involved
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
