Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 101,379
Reco Reed v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
as 24-1899
Plaintiff: RECO REED
Defendant: WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
TINSLEY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00865
Petitioner: GARY TINSLEY
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
YOUNG v. BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv00861
Plaintiff: STEVEN RAY YOUNG
Defendant: BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL, ARN HOLT, LYDIA JOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOVER v. DIVISION OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00870
Petitioner: JESSE JAMES STOVER
Respondent: DIVISION OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rudder v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv01363
Petitioner: Jarrod Rudder
Respondent: Warden and Nurse Mindi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Spencer et al
as 3:2024cv01364
Plaintiff: Gregory D. Jones
Defendant: Jeffrey D. Spencer, J. Saddler and J. Cowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Longanecker v. USA
as 2:2024cv02117
Petitioner: Joseph Adam Longanecker
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. Lawrence Correctional Center
as 1:2024cv01191
Petitioner: Jackie Lee Williams, Jr
Respondent: Lawrence Correctional Center
Not Yet Classified: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Link v. Dronenberg et al
as 1:2024cv01192
Plaintiff: Kaz Link
Defendant: . Dronenberg, Cheryl Hansen, . Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flohr v. Jeff Siegel et al
as 3:2024cv00415
Defendant: ROBERT FLOHR, Elkhart County Sheriff Jeff Siegel, John Does/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?