Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Bray v. Lain etal
as 2:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
George E Bray
Defendant:
David Lain, John Widup, Robert Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO DOCUMENTS v. Wabash Valley Correctional Facility
as 2:2011cv00404
Petitioner:
Kashmir LaJuan Bray
Respondent:
Wabash Valley Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO DOCUMENTS v. Superintendent
as 2:2011cv00390
Petitioner:
Kashmir LaJuan Bray
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO DOCUMENTS v. Sevier et al
as 3:2011cv00407
Plaintiff:
Kashmir La Juan Bray
Defendant:
Mark R Sevier, Clair Baines, Capt Truax and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAY v. LEMMAN et al
as 2:2011cv00268
Defendant:
DAVID BONNER, SUPERINTENDENT RICHARD BROWN, COMMISSIONER BRUCE LEMMAN and others
Plaintiff:
KASHMIR L. BRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAY v. WELLS et al
as 2:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
KASHMIR L. BRAY
Defendant:
LENWEBBER and R. WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bray v. Superintendent of Wabash Valley Correctional Facility
as 2:2011cv00269
Petitioner:
Kashmir La Juan Bray
Respondent:
Wabash Valley Correctional Facility Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRAY v. LEMMAN et al
as 2:2011cv00141
Defendant:
DAVID BONNER, RICHARD BROWN, D. DAUGHERTY and others
Plaintiff:
KASHMIR L. BRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bray v. Superintendent
as 2:2010cv00302
Petitioner:
Kashmir La Juan Bray
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
-DGB Smith v. Kankakee County Hospital Dist et al
as 2:2010cv02160
Petitioner:
Charles W Smith
Respondent:
Sue Lecuyer , Michael Downey , Clyde Dayhoff and others
Defendant:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
