Cases 31 - 40 of 559
Richardson v. Miles, et al
as 1:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
Jamie Richardson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Cook County Jail, Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv01564
Plaintiff:
Jamie Richardson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Cook County Sheriffs, Cook County Jail DOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Collins et al
as 1:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Hampton
Defendant:
Daniel A. Collins and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles v. Ryan et al
as 1:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Charles
Defendant:
Ryan, Doherty, City Of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Herbert Pitts
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gilmore
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, Arresting Officer #1, Arresting Officer #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milner v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07181
Plaintiff:
Anthony Milner
Defendant:
City of Chicago, County of Cook and Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hannibal Eason v. Kwame Raoul, et al
as 22-3126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HANNIBAL EASON
Defendant / Appellee:
KWAME RAOUL, OFFICE OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL, KIMBERLY M. FOXX and others
Bruce Pickett v. City of Chicago, et al
as 23-1044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRUCE A. PICKETT
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO and DEPARTMENT OF STREETS AND SANITATION, Chicago
Walker v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv06264
Plaintiff:
Khari Walker
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Bradley R Scaduto and J M Toliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
