Cases 31 - 40 of 70
BERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv01320
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
BURGESS DOE, HENSHAW DOE, WENDY KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. WEXFORD HEALTH MEDICAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2018cv01327
Plaintiff:
EARLIE BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
BARNS DOE, BRAD DOE, COLLINS DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv01322
Defendant:
J. GAIN (DOE), RODGERS (DOE), DAVIS DOE and others
Plaintiff:
EARLIE BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv01324
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
COUCH DOE, DUNCAN DOE, HERBERT DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv01323
Defendant:
LISA BERGESON, BRAD DOE, COLLINS DOE and others
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Early Atterberry v. John Varga
as 18-1360
Petitioner - Appellant:
EARLY A. ATTERBERRY
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN VARGA
BERRY v. SMITH
as 2:2017cv00250
Petitioner:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BERRY v. SMITH
as 2:2017cv00252
Petitioner:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BERRY v. SMITH
as 2:2017cv00251
Petitioner:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BERRY v. SMITH
as 2:2017cv00253
Petitioner:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
