Cases 31 - 40 of 456
Giles, Dale v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
Dale Giles
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hari v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2022cv01240
Plaintiff:
Emily Claire Hari and Michael B Hari
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWE v. RULE et al
as 2:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
JERRY KAY LOWE, JR
Defendant:
RULE, DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DAVID MILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWE v. RULE et al
as 1:2022cv01383
Plaintiff:
JERRY KAY LOWE, JR
Defendant:
RULE, DIRECTOR OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DAVID MILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOFFMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
MONTE G HOFFMAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RULE and BARNHARDT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
Marcus Deangelo Jones
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and M Stegal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Monte G Hoffman
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Rule and Barnhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Rule et al
as 3:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Jerry Kay Lowe, Jr
Defendant:
Rule, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and David Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acosta v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2022cv50199
Plaintiff:
Hanoi Barbaro Acosta
Defendant:
United States Of America, Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Christopher Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Fairly Earls v. BOP
as 22-2023
Petitioner / Appellant:
FAIRLY W. EARLS
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
