Cases 41 - 50 of 2,712
John Hawkins v. Tonya Conley, et al
as 24-1880
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. HAWKINS, also known as JOHN ANTHONY HAWKINS-EL
Defendant:
TONYA CONLEY, DONNY BETZNER and RICHARD BROWN
Christopher Croom v. Joshua Schoenback, et al
as 24-1875
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. CROOM
Defendant:
JOSHUA SCHOENBACK, TERRANCE JACKSON, SANDY WALKER and others
Johnson v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Johnson
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills, Nurse Crane, Nurse Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickman v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Anthony S Hickman and Anthony Scott Hickman
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Eric J Holcomb, Todd Rokita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canty v. Lammer
as 1:2024cv04028
Petitioner:
Anthony Canty
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Peter Fowler v. Lucas Bohnert, et al
as 24-1840
Plaintiff:
PETER FOWLER
Defendant:
LUCAS BOHNERT, Correctional Officer, JOSEPH CHILDERS, Correctional Officer, ANTHONY WILLS and others
Canty v. Lammer
as 4:2024cv04091
Petitioner:
Anthony Canty
Respondent:
B Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mosley v. County Of Will et al
as 1:2024cv03792
Plaintiff:
Johnathan N Mosley
Defendant:
County Of Will, Nicolas Keedy, Anthony Gomez Delacasa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Illinois
as 3:2024cv01251
Petitioner:
Anthony Thomas Dewayne Woodard and Anthony D Woodard
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01248
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Walker, Terrance Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
