Cases 41 - 50 of 1,558
Jackson, John v. Oneida County Jail (HSU)
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
John Jackson
Defendant:
Oneida County Jail (HSU)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv01956
Plaintiff:
Richard Hodges
Defendant:
Niccoelle E. Jackson and Tyneer N. Butler-Winters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv01883
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
JB Pritzker, Latoya Hughes, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Jones
as 1:2024cv01657
Petitioner:
Sr. Lawrence L Jackson
Respondent:
Illinois River Correctional Center and Chance Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bobby Johnson v. Lucas Maue, et al
as 24-1254
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JOHNSON
Defendant:
LUCAS MAUE, C/O, Menard CC, TERRANCE JACKSON, C/O, Menard CC, GARRETT GRIFFIN, C/O, Menard CC and others
MCCRACKEN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, CARLA COAKLEY, M. PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Primus v. Fry
as 3:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Carron Lee Primus
Defendant:
Mr Fry and Jackson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FILZEN v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
KORRTEL FILZEN
Defendant:
JACKSON and HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Jackson
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse and David Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARTING v. MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HARTING
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, TYLER JUGG, JONATHAN GRIMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
