Cases 41 - 50 of 268
McDonald v. Shebel et al
as 1:2022cv06489
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. McDonald and Christopher O. McDonald
Defendant:
Susan Shebel, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald, Erik v. Cousins, Cass
as 3:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
Erik McDonald, Jr.
Defendant:
The State Of Wisconsin and Cass Cousins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS et al v. EDMONDS et al
as 1:2022cv02184
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
REAGAL, EDMONDS, A. SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Walsh et al
as 1:2022cv06196
Plaintiff:
Lynn T Washington
Defendant:
Supt. Walsh, Sgt. Bremmer, Nurse Estember and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karimu v. Thompson et al
as 3:2022cv00903
Plaintiff:
William Karimu
Defendant:
Jerry Thompson, Anthony Luckey, Travis Judy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Marthakis et al
as 3:2022cv00773
Plaintiff:
William Andrew McDonald
Defendant:
Nancy Marthakis and Diane Thews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. VINARDI, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James et al v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
Devoris James, Danny Horton, Anthony Gipson and others
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Correction, Ernest Pickens, Megan Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. U.S.P. Thomson
as 3:2022cv50276
Plaintiff:
Domonic McDonald
Defendant:
U.S.P. Thomson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TOWNSEND v. KEYES et al
as 2:2022cv00337
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. TOWNSEND
Defendant:
KEYES, LEFTLER, SIMMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
