Cases 41 - 50 of 195
GREEN v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP GREEN
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES. LLC and CENTURION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahone et al v. Becker et al
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mahone, Kevin Phillip Mahone, Sr, Hope Marie Allman and others
Defendant:
Vickie Becker, Anna Rich, Kris Seymore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv00261
Petitioner:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Respondent:
REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PHILLIPS v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv00262
Petitioner:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Respondent:
REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PHILLIPS v. CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
CHAMBERS, S. MCCANN, REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURKES v. RICHARDSON et al
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
JABARI BURKES
Defendant:
RICHARSON, WHITE, PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. SURGUY et al
as 1:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
SURGUY, T. SOLOMON, R. GOODNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. BOONE COUNTY COURTHOUSE et al
as 1:2022cv02367
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP MICHEAL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BOONE COUNTY COURTHOUSE and CIRCUIT COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIGALANZ v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv02335
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP S. GRIGALANZ
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. MERSHAN et al
as 1:2022cv02321
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
MERSHAN, MARTIAL KNIESER and PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
