Cases 41 - 50 of 3,468
Norwood v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv03073
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Norwood
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Director Wilensky, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cook County et al
as 1:2022cv02794
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County, Thomas Dart, Superintendent of Div-8-RTU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Spates et al
as 3:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Billy Brown
Defendant:
Spates, Robert Deu, Yancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. LEMON et al
as 2:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
BRUCE LEMON, FRANK VANIHEL, S. TIERNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Epps v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv02393
Plaintiff:
Chase Epps
Defendant:
THOMAS DART, Amanda Gallegos, Superintendent Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT OF PENDLECTON CORR. FACILITY et al
as 1:2022cv00864
Plaintiff:
LANCE MARLEY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT OF PENDLECTON CORR. FACILITY, DHB BOARD (SGT. C. COOKE) and ALL INVOLVED THAT MAY BE AMENDED LATER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn Turner v. Gary Boughton, et al
as 22-1596
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLENN T. TURNER
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY BOUGHTON, EDWARD WALL, TROY HERMANS and others
Mansoori v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv01642
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Mansoori
Defendant:
John Doe, C.O. Adams, C.O. Mintah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mansoori v. JT Support Services Superintendant et al
as 1:2022cv01634
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mansoori
Defendant:
JT Support Services Superintendant and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corey Brooks v. Ronda Guyton, et al
as 22-1476
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY BROOKS
Defendant / Appellee:
RONDA GUYTON, Superintendent, SUPERVISOR KART, SUPERVISOR SMITH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
