Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 13,472
Seibert, Jerrad v. State of Wisconsin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00343
Petitioner: Jerrad T. Seibert
Respondent: State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. USA
as 1:2024cv00215
Petitioner: Dewayne Lewis
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thomas, Jr. v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00427
Plaintiff: Gentle Thomas, Jr.
Defendant: United States of America
Not Yet Classified: WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Budde et al
as 1:2024cv04483
Plaintiff: Samuel A. Scott, Jr.
Defendant: Daniel Budde, James W. Glasgow, Will County Shaffs Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Kurz v. USA
as 24-1904
Petitioner: DAVID KURZ
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Clay
as 1:2024cv04217
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Carleous Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Dana Green v. USA
as 24-1881
Petitioner: DANA L. GREEN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Washington v. Marthakis et al
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff: James Orlando Washington and James O Washington
Defendant: Nancy B Marthakis, Centurion Health of Indiana LLC, Ashley Burnham and others
Not Yet Classified: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff: DAMON JAMES
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA and BRANCHVILLE INSTITUTION/WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Dillon v. USA
as 24-1876
Petitioner: ERIC M. DILLON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?