Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Gray v. Beck et al
as 1:2013cv04873
Plaintiff:
Joseph U. Gray
Defendant:
Alexander Beck, Carla Policandriotes, Christi Prinzi Basis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lobo v. Walton
as 3:2012cv01204
Petitioner:
Carlos U Lobo
Respondent:
J. S. Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HANKINS v. CUMMINS et al
as 1:2012cv00683
Defendant:
NURSE ANGIE, NURSE MICHELLE, NURSE NANCY and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHON MICHAEL HANKINS
MR:
JOHNSON CTY JAIL DEP SYPES
MRS:
JOHNSON CTY JAIL DEP SYPES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Cross
as 3:2011cv01010
Petitioner:
Roque U. Garcia
Respondent:
James Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Linder et al v. U. S. Marshalls, et al
as 1:2011cv07611
Plaintiff:
Judy Ann Linder
Defendant:
U. S. Marshalls and Ogle County Meidcal Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collier v. Attorney General of the State of Illinois et al
as 3:2011cv00807
Petitioner:
Artimus A Collier
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Illinois and U S Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Saeed Younger v. Donald Hulick, et al
as 11-2139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAEED YOUNGER
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, U. REES, Shift Supervisor, JODI SUHRE and others
Collier v. U S Marshals Service et al
as 3:2010cv00889
Petitioner:
Artimus A. Collier
Respondent:
U S Marshals Service and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Collier v. U S Marshals Service et al
as 3:2010cv00888
Petitioner:
Artimus A. Collier
Respondent:
U S Marshals Service and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cowart v. U-Haul Truck Rental Corporation
as 1:2010cv05318
Plaintiff:
Gregory Cowart
Defendant:
U-Haul Truck Rental Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
