Cases 51 - 60 of 262
LINDSEY v. MOORE et al
as 1:2022cv01469
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL LINDSEY and NATHAN E. LINDSEY
Defendant:
MOORE, GUNTHRY and GEO GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffery McCrory v. Jason Jamerson, et al
as 22-2095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY MCCRORY
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON P. JAMERSON, ROSEMARY KHOURY, SHEILA ASHLEY and others
MILLER v. HACKER et al
as 1:2022cv01240
Plaintiff:
ARTHULA MILLER
Defendant:
MACKENIZE HACKER, M. PAGE-CALDWELL and GEO GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL, JR. v. THE GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HALL, JR.
Defendant:
THE GEO GROUP, INC., CORRECTIONAL LIEUTENANT FARR and CORRECTIONAL SERGEANT KLEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSLEY v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00950
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and GEO GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MISHLER v. WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
PAUL L. MISHLER, JR.
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, M. MITCHEFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2022cv00719
Plaintiff:
JASON REED
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, CENTURION HEALTH, GEO CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00694
Plaintiff:
DEREK BOYD
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., KRISTEN DAUSS, ANGELA REAVES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIRDWELL v. THE GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2022cv00680
Plaintiff:
AARON BIRDWELL
Defendant:
THE GEO GROUP and CENTURION MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYS v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00651
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. MAYS
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., CENTURION HEALTH, WEXFORD OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
