Cases 51 - 60 of 530
BURKE v. MYERS et al
as 1:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BURKE
Defendant:
RICK MYERS, HARDIN, DAVISSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 1:2023cv01284
Plaintiff:
Rodney Williams
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Alberto Butalid, Vipin Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Angle et al
as 3:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
John A Hawkins, John A Hawkins-El and John Anthony Hawkins-El
Defendant:
Nathan Angle, B Myers, Ind Dep't of Correction's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokich v. Diss et al
as 1:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
Michael D Stokich
Defendant:
Adam Diss, . Hill, . Cravatta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAWKINS-EL v. ANGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. HAWKINS-EL
Defendant:
NATHAN ANGLE and B. MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Patrick et al
as 3:2023cv03226
Plaintiff:
Joseph James
Defendant:
Patrick .., Stephanie Howard, Jennifer Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wisnauski v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv02261
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wisnauski
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Travis Bayler, Dr. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v Blades et al
as 3:2023cv02221
Plaintiff:
Mark Davenport
Defendant:
Deb Bledsoe, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Percy Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Abernathy v. Percy Myers, et al
as 23-2271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD ABERNATHY
Defendant / Appellee:
PERCY MYERS, Doctor and KATHRYN ADAMS
Pello v. Wexford Medical et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
James Michael Pello, James M Pello and James Pello
Defendant:
Wexford Medical, Centurion Medical, Kuenzli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
