Cases 61 - 70 of 71
Walker v. Garnhart
as 3:2010cv50037
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Walker
Defendant:
M. Garnhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Armson et al
as 3:2009cv00756
Plaintiff:
Lamont D. Walker
Defendant:
Ryan Armson, Victor Trumbil, Bryant Neumaier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Walker v. Executive Committee of the Uni
as 09-3132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC D. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Eric Walker v. Ryan Show, et al
as 09-3102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC D. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
RYAN SHOW, #154, ADRIENNE KNAZZE, Sergeant, STEVE MCGRATH and others
Walker v. Will County Illinois et al
as 1:2009cv05096
Plaintiff:
Eric D Walker
Defendant:
Will County Illinois, Pamela J McGuire, James W Glasgow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00670
Plaintiff:
Eric D Walker
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Major Pickering and Daniel L Austin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00595
Plaintiff:
Eric D Walker
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Pinckneyville Correctional Center and Doctor Gardner
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walker v. Illinois Department of Corrections
as 3:2008cv00596
Plaintiff:
Eric D Walker
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WALKER v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2008cv01098
Petitioner:
STEPHEN D. WALKER
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Whitfield v. Adamson et al
as 3:2007cv00819
Plaintiff:
BenYehudah Whitfield
Defendant:
C/O Adamson, Neil C. Bantican, R Baylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
