Cases 71 - 80 of 457
Thames v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv50046
Plaintiff:
Linord Thames
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Sonja Nicklaus, Amber Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King Jr. v. Kinser et al
as 1:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Roy Delane King Jr.
Defendant:
Lisa Kinser, Kinser Law, Inc. and River Valley Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Cassidy et al
as 3:2022cv50025
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant:
Jacob Cassidy, Ann Ganger, Nurse Thielen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard et al v. Wilks et al
as 3:2022cv50026
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant:
Justin Wilks, Jefrey Dalke, William Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King Jr. v. Perell et al
as 1:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
Roy Delane King Jr.
Defendant:
Perell, Will County Sheriff Office, Will County Court House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmonson v. Rosen et al
as 2:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jason L Edmonson
Defendant:
Officer Rosen, Schroeder, CO Duprey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King, Jr. v. Lockport Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Roy D. King, Jr.
Defendant:
Lockport Police Department, Joliet Police Department, Will County Sheriffs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Bloodworth
as 3:2021cv01734
Petitioner:
King Michael Oliver
Respondent:
Ralph R. Bloodworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Hill et al
as 3:2021cv01719
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alexander King
Defendant:
Kathy Hill, Dan Sproul, Guy Pagli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Hill et al
as 3:2021cv01714
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alexander King
Defendant:
Kathy Hill, S. Wallace, Tammy Hottes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
