Cases 81 - 90 of 108
Ketchum v. Donahue et al
as 3:2007cv00316
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ketchum
Defendant:
J David Donahue, Aramark Food Service, Dean Reiger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Hjerquist et al
as 3:2007cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jaquell L Dixon
Defendant:
D Hjerquist, John R Vanatta and J David Donahue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COX v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2007cv00166
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN J COX
Defendant:
DAVID DONAHUE, DAWN BUSS, WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KETCHEM v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2007cv00860
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA KETCHEM
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE and ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Crawford et al
as 3:2007cv00289
Plaintiff:
David R Neal
Defendant:
Crawford, Mrs C Mongomery, Altos Amos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2007cv00805
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY PARKS
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, MITCH E. DANIELS, JR., STEVE CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALONE v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2007cv00790
Plaintiff:
LAVELLE MALONE
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE, STANLEY KNIGHT, JAMES COOTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Buss et al
as 3:2007cv00285
Plaintiff:
Lionel Gibson
Defendant:
Eddie Buss, J David Donahue, Gilbert Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. DONAHUE
as 3:2007cv00072
Plaintiff:
LOWELL COOPER
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COBB v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2007cv00674
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL COBB, SR.
Defendant:
DAVID DONAHUE, STANLEY KNIGHT, STEVE JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
