Cases 81 - 90 of 213
PURVIS v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00530
Plaintiff:
WILLARD PURVIS
Defendant:
GEORGE C. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO), GEO GROUP, INC., PRESIDENT, GEO CORRECTIONS AND DETENTION, GEO, GROUP, INC. and GEO GROUP INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUIZ v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00246
Defendant:
HANNAH WINNINGHAM, ELLIOT, TERRY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO RUIZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDS v. GEO GROUP et al
as 1:2021cv00225
Defendant:
MOORE, FRENCH, OWENS and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWE v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ROWE
Defendant:
GLEN THOMPSON, J. FRENCH, KIM GARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUSTIN v. WEXFORD HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS et al
as 1:2020cv03226
Defendant:
ANDERSON, WEXFORD HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS, SCHILLING and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2020cv03193
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH, STORMS and others
Plaintiff:
NOAH MICHAEL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2020cv03195
Plaintiff:
NOAH MICHAEL MILLER and GIT-R-DONE
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, GEO GROUP INC., JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03062
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC. and INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTION
Plaintiff:
JAMES HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFITH v. JONES et al
as 1:2020cv03048
Defendant:
HALL, JENNIFER SMITH, NORNES and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES GRIFFITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. The Geo Group et al
as 3:2020cv00952
Defendant:
Wexford of Indiana, Moore, Mr Newkirk and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Danny R Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
