Cases 1 - 10 of 72
TONEY v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
ANGUS J. TONEY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TONEY v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00386
Defendant:
TRAVIS DAVIS, ANDREA STROUP, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
ANGUS JAMES TONEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sartorius v. Angus
as 1:2017cv01448
Plaintiff:
Larry Sartorius
Defendant:
Alton Angus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Jackson v. Alton Angus, et al
as 16-1888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSE MATHEWS, ALTON ANGUS, MICHAEL P. MELVIN and others
Jackson v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 3:2015cv00920
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv01334
Plaintiff:
Hershel Morgan
Defendant:
Sarah Johnson, Leslie McCarty, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manzanales v. Illinois Deptarment of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01299
Plaintiff:
Pedro Manzanales, Jr
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Pontiac Correctional Center, Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Jackson v. Alton Angus, et al
as 15-2199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ALTON ANGUS, Psychologist, MICHAEL P. MELVIN, Superintendent, LAWRENCE R. WEINER, Therapeutic Service Admission Review and others
Robinson v. Jhassen et al
as 1:2015cv01147
Plaintiff:
DeLaurence Robinson
Defendant:
T Jhassen, . Liles, . Delong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dace v. Skeens et al
as 1:2015cv01138
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dace
Defendant:
Kristina Skeens, Salvador Godinez, David Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
