Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Green v. Adkins
as 3:2024cv03134
Petitioner:
Lawrence P Green
Respondent:
Felicia Adkins
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Wells et al
as 2:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Jacob Daniel Young
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, Jennifer Chacon, . Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Adkins
as 2:2024cv02114
Petitioner:
Juan Ortiz
Respondent:
Felicia Adkins
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeude v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
Todd Jeude
Defendant:
USA, United States Marshalls Service, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. SILVIA et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
SILVIA, DUNLAP, WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
House v. Adkins
as 1:2024cv01169
Petitioner:
Jumar Antione House
Respondent:
Felicia Adkins
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schargorodsky v. Ek et al
as 2:2024cv02090
Plaintiff:
Anthony Schargorodsky
Defendant:
Jonathan Ek, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Jennifer Chacon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Adkins et al
as 2:2024cv02057
Plaintiff:
Sayvon Jones
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Incorporated, Felicia Adkins and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mabry v. Adkins et al
as 2:2024cv02007
Plaintiff:
Devon Carl Mabry
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, Jennifer Chacon, Jonathan Ek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
De'Angelo Don'Virgil Winston
Defendant:
Scott Spurlock, Misty Adkins, Zachery Schelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
