Cases 1 - 10 of 469
ARON-STOREY et al v. GILBERT et al
as 1:2024cv01789
Defendant:
CHARLEY, JANE DOE #4, JANE DOE #5 and others
Plaintiff:
BROWN and ANSHIOUS B.D. ARON-STOREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUMMERS v. FOSTER et al
as 1:2024cv01615
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. SUMMERS, III
Defendant:
JACKSON, FOSTER, COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Michael v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00613
Defendant:
Leo Hammer, Mike Olsen, Kevin and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Christian County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2024cv03236
Defendant:
Christian County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Joseph Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levitski v. Heintz
as 3:2024cv50352
Defendant:
Benjamin Heintz
Plaintiff:
Austin Kele Levitski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01934
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Nurse James, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Folks v. Marburger et al
as 1:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Marcus Folks
Defendant:
Austin Marburger and Jesse A Lanphear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Bramwell et al
as 3:2024cv03213
Defendant:
Seth Bramwell, Illinois Department of Corrections, Amy Hickey and others
Plaintiff:
Chardey Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ECKES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2024cv01287
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN LEE ECKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Springfield Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv03203
Defendant:
Unknown Police Officer, Springfield Police Department and Kenneth Scarlette
Plaintiff:
Austin Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
