Cases 1 - 10 of 46
BRAY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
QUINTIN BRAY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bray v. Will County Adult Detention Facility et al
as 1:2023cv15973
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bray
Defendant:
Will County Adult Detention Facility and Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hasemyer et al
as 3:2022cv01384
Plaintiff:
Jeramey R Brown
Defendant:
Chad Hasemyer, Jessica Huffman, Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Bray v. Westville Correctional Center, et al
as 22-1151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM BRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
WESTVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, JOHN GALIPEAU, MR. WATTS and others
Bray - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Westville Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility, Galipeau, Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAY v. RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER et al
as 1:2021cv02522
Defendant:
HAWK, MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM BRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. St. Clair County Unknown Officers
as 3:2021cv00481
Defendant:
St. Clair County Unknown Officers
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Boyd et al
as 3:2021cv00215
Defendant:
John T Boyd and Tiger Correctional Services
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Quality Correctional Care LLC
as 3:2021cv00186
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Care LLC
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
