Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Malone v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50348
Plaintiff:
William Malone and Bill
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Wilks et al
as 3:2023cv50130
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Defendant:
Justin Wilks, Andrea Tack, Joanna Kemmeren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv00090
Defendant:
Unknown Superintendent at CCDOC, Unknown Correctional Officer, Tezzazas and others
Plaintiff:
Durius JL Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Speights, Jael v. Agnesian Healthcare et al
as 3:2020cv01098
Defendant:
Eileen S. Gavin, Agnesian Healthcare, "John Doe" Employer of Eileen S. Gavin and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Jael Speights
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirksey v. Burger King Worldwide Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06964
Plaintiff:
Aric A Kirksey
Defendant:
Burger King Worldwide Inc., Thomas Harris, Daniel Munoz-Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BINGHAM v. ZATECKY
as 1:2016cv00955
Petitioner:
ALBERT BINGHAM
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bingham v. Baker et al
as 1:2015cv11740
Plaintiff:
Jason Bingham
Defendant:
Jennifer Baker, Brad Josephson, Dr. Okeze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bingham v. Woolsey et al
as 3:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jason Bingham
Defendant:
Derrick Woolsey, James Luth and Assistant Warden Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BINGHAM v. ZATECKY
as 2:2014cv00361
Petitioner:
RICKY BINGHAM
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bingham v. Kelly et al
as 1:2014cv03411
Plaintiff:
Jason Bingham
Defendant:
Patrick Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
