Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Juan Alvarado-Gonzalez v. Christopher Thompson, et al
as 24-1122
Plaintiff:
JUAN ALVARADO-GONZALEZ
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON, Warden, Pinckneyville CC, DUSTIN BOWLES, C/O, Pinckneyville CC, MAC-SHANE FRANK, Lieutenant, Pinckneyville CC and others
BOWLING v. WARDEN
as 3:2023cv00072
Petitioner:
MICHAEL W. BOWLING
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOWLES v. FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
WILSON JAMES E. BOWLES
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSTON v. DOLLERIS et al
as 4:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
GERALD JOHNSTON
Defendant:
TROY DOLLERIS, ROGER NEWLON, BRENT MILLER and others
Not Classified By Court:
TODD VARE and MITCHELL L. OSTERDAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAINES v. MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ADVISORY BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv03029
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO GAINES
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS ADVISORY BOARD, DUVALL RESIDENTIAL CENTER, SHANNON BOWLING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNT v. JEFFRIES et al
as 1:2021cv02633
Plaintiff:
WYATT W. HUNT
Defendant:
KEVIN L. JEFFRIES, TYLER BOWLING, KERRY RANDLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00693
Defendant:
C/O Swisher, Lieutenant Miller, C/O Hagston and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00664
Defendant:
C. Heck, Mr. Adams, Mr. Spiller and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Chapman et al
as 3:2021cv00620
Defendant:
C. Heck, Treg Vanderkhove, Mark A. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00683
Defendant:
R. Oleary, Chad Adams, C/O Summers and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
