Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00199
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Newkirk, Ron Neal, Mark Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Varga
as 3:2022cv03093
Petitioner:
Brandon Johnson
Respondent:
John Varga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
French Mason v. Zack Bullock, et al
as 22-1792
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRENCH MASON, also known as FRENCH CHESTER MASON-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ZACK BULLOCK, Prison guard, sued in their individual and official capacity, CHARLES CALVERT, Prison guard, sued in their individual and official capacity, BRANDON JOHNSON, Prison guard, sued in their individual and official capacity and others
Mason v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Shannon Evans, Alisha Conley, George Payne and others
Plaintiff:
French Mason
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson-Brown v. Dart
as 1:2017cv07288
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson-Brown
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson-Brown v. Dart
as 1:2017cv05658
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson-Brown
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson-Brown v. Dart
as 1:2017cv05633
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson-Brown
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon Johnson v. Karen Jaimet
as 17-2272
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRANDON JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
KAREN JAIMET
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
