Johnson v. Neal et al
| Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson |
| Newkirk, Ron Neal, Mark Newkirk, Wardlow, Tibbles, Calaway, Dustain, Itodo, Bootz, Taylor, Beal, Lott, Winn, Koen, Darschewski, Moon, Haskell, Stovall, Wolford, Zepada, Lewis, Hudson and Ball |
| 3:2023cv00610 |
| June 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Michael G Gotsch |
| Damon R Leichty |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER: Brandon Lee Johnson is GRANTED until 9/19/2023, to respond to this order and CAUTIONED if he does not respond by the deadline, this case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael G Gotsch, Sr on 8/18/2023. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(mrm)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Ball, Beal, Bootz, Calaway, Darschewski, Dustain, Haskell, Hudson, Itodo, Koen, Lewis, Lott, Moon, Ron Neal, Newkirk, Stovall, Taylor, Tibbles, Wardlow, Winn, Wolford, Zepada, filed by Brandon Lee Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(No filing fee or IFP received)(File stamped 6/22/2023 from ISP, e-file not received by court. Paper copy scanned 6/29/2023)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Johnson)(kmt) Modified to add docket text on 6/30/2023 (kmt).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
