Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Blount v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Carl Blount
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Pamela Bane and Mark Newkirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Drogosz v. Mark Newkirk, et al
as 23-2335
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DROGOSZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK NEWKIRK and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Moore v. Schneider et al
as 3:2023cv00651
Defendant:
Hasza, J Schneider, D Buss and others
Plaintiff:
Garganus Moore
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Wexford et al
as 3:2023cv00607
Defendant:
Wexford, Centurion, Corizon and others
Plaintiff:
DeJuan Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Johnson and Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Newkirk, Ron Neal, Mark Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lundberg v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lundberg
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Bradbury, Allmon and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Neal et al
as 3:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Winn, Mark Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv01046
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Mark Newkirk, Allman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leonard Thomas v. Mark Sevier, et al
as 22-2759
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK R. SEVIER, Warden, MARK NEWKIRK, DOUGLAS BARNES and others
Clarence Martin, Jr. v. D. Wardlow, et al
as 22-2571
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE A. MARTIN, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
D. WARDLOW, JESSICA THERAULT, J. WALLEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
