Cases 1 - 10 of 329
MCCANN v. PRIME CARE et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
LONNIE MCCANN
Defendant:
PRIME CARE, CHRISTIAN SMITH, MR. DECALVISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolford v. Nationwide Investigations & Security, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01543
Plaintiff:
Charles Wolford
Defendant:
Nationwide Investigations & Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ali v. Ramsey County Sheriff Office et al
as 0:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Tamir Malik Ali
Defendant:
Ramsey County Sheriff Office, Kelly Wolford, County of Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eric Poole v. R. Roderick
as 24-6327
Plaintiff:
ERIC VON POOLE
Defendant:
R. RODERICK, CMM, PAUL WHEELER, CMM, NBCI (individual/official capacity), WCI'S ARP COORDINATOR, day of (individual/official capacity) and others
Clark (PS) v. Wolford et al
as 1:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Andre M. Clark
Defendant:
Jacob Wolford and Doyle Dunnam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOLFORD v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
MARK WOLFORD
Respondent:
WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wolford v. Ruiz
as 6:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Melissa Wolford
Defendant:
Mayra Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alford v. Schweitzer et al
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Defendant:
Warden Tom Schweitzer, Mr. C. Cann, Mr. Z. Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCANN v. CHERNISKY et al
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
LONNIE MCCANN
Defendant:
THOMAS C. CHERNISKY, WARDEN SMITH, CAPTAIN WOLFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolford v. Barron
as 2:2023cv01689
Petitioner:
Audrey Jean Wolford
Respondent:
Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
