Cases 1 - 10 of 621
Newkirk v. Wong et al
as 3:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Gordon L. Newkirk, Jr.
Defendant:
Danielle Wong, Paul Hammick, Zackary Klomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Doyle et al
as 3:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Gordon L. Newkirk, Jr.
Defendant:
Paul R. Doyle, Donavan Murphy and Hilary Carpender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk-Goethe et al v. Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01659
Plaintiff:
Michelle Newkirk-Goethe and Terrence Goethe
Defendant:
Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc. doing business as GE Appliances, Haier America Company, L.L.C., Haier America Trading, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Blount v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Carl Blount
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Pamela Bane and Mark Newkirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Newkirk v. Director Department of Corrections
as 24-6341
Petitioner:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Respondent:
DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Kenneth Newkirk v. Director, Department of Corrections
as 24-6336
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Newkirk v. Rosh
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Kyle Rosh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Clarke
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
John Newkirk
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Leo Arnone, Cheryl Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Warden Artrip, Investigator Harris, Assistant Warden Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
