Cases 1 - 10 of 50
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MARSHALL A.K.A. DEEZ NUTZ
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, KELCY PENNINGTON and COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. ARMSTRONG et al
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
STACY SMITH
Defendant:
LISA ARMSTRONG, OFFICER COUCH, MEGAN OLSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2023cv01874
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY LAMAR PARKER
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, SHERIFF, DUZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Forestal et al
as 2:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Courtney Lamar Parker
Defendant:
Kerry J Forestal, Sheriff, Duze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YEANEY v. COUCH et al
as 1:2023cv01257
Plaintiff:
MARKUS YEANEY
Defendant:
GEORGY COUCH, CINDY WRIGHT, L. RASMUSSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COUCH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
JOE DEE COUCH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
ELLIS v. LAWSON et al
as 1:2023cv00959
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
LAWSON, SCOTT and COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COUCH v. USA
as 1:2022cv02351
Petitioner:
LOGAN COUCH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Couch v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2020cv04190
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, John Baldwin, . Pumfrey and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Couch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WAGONER v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv01963
Defendant:
LAURA RASMUSSEN, HUNT, BARTLET and others
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY WAGONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
