Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Davis v. Chisholm et al
as 2:2023cv00494
Petitioner:
Glenn M Davis
Respondent:
John Chisholm, James J Martin, Laura Arbuckle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guyton v. Haack et al
as 2:2021cv00531
Plaintiff:
Chanler Lee Guyton
Defendant:
Shawn Mogen, John Doe, The County of Door and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fillyaw v. Tenhaken et al
as 2:2020cv00827
Defendant:
John Doe I, Catelin Ringersma, John T Chisholm and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Fillyaw, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogan v. Barrett et al
as 2:2019cv00372
Defendant:
Justice Point, John Barrett, Virginia Stuller and others
Plaintiff:
Antwan Bogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. IDOC et al
as 3:2018cv00906
Defendant:
Kimele, Conley, Indiana State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Freemon Jordan, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Schimel et al
as 2:2018cv01384
Defendant:
Milwaukee County District Attorney's Office, Brad Schimel, John Chisholm and others
Plaintiff:
Bryson McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogan et al v. Schimel et al
as 2:2018cv01204
Plaintiff:
Kameron Walker, Bryson McKinney, Terrance Holland and others
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Circuit Court, Division of Community Corrections, John Chisholm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogan v. Chisholm et al
as 2:2018cv01091
Defendant:
Michael C Schindhelm, Virginia Stuller, John T Chisholm and others
Plaintiff:
Antwan Bogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v. Newport et al
as 2:2016cv00010
Plaintiff:
Billy Cannon
Defendant:
Dean Newport, Michael Kurowski, Michael Tobin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cannon v. Newport et al
as 2:2015cv01397
Plaintiff:
Billy Cannon
Defendant:
Dean Newport, Michael Kurowski, David Sweet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
