Cases 1 - 10 of 173
Ian Lockhart v. Charles Best, et al
as 24-1311
Plaintiff:
IAN LOCKHART
Defendant:
CHARLES BEST, Lieutenant, BAREA V. MIGGINS, JOSHUA CLEMENTS and others
Morales v. Mena et al
as 1:2023cv16712
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lee Lua Morales
Defendant:
Magalid Mena, Marcos Mena and Clemente
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clements v. Glossip et al
as 4:2023cv04162
Plaintiff:
Demarcco Clements
Defendant:
Louis Glossip, Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc, Brad Abernathy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murithi et al v. Godnez et al
as 1:2022cv06023
Plaintiff:
Mwenda Murithi
Defendant:
Salvador A Godnez, Sherry Benton, Kimberly Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Carr et al
as 2:2022cv00924
Plaintiff:
Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan)
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Brian Foster, Anthony Meli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Allen v. Wexford Healthcare Company et al
as 3:2022cv03050
Plaintiff:
Andrew Allen
Defendant:
Wexford Healthcare Company, Office of Health Services, Thomas Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Litscher et al
as 2:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Crandall Henderson
Defendant:
Jon Litscher, Randall Hepp, Chris Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2021cv00242
Defendant:
Barber Blake, Mr Sabish, Mr Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
Cornell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Southard v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2020cv03238
Defendant:
Greg Scott, Rob Jeffreys, Ashley Clement and others
Plaintiff:
Benny Southard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turuc v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2020cv03235
Plaintiff:
James Turuc
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Kwame Raoul, Ashley Clement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
