Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brazier v. East Saint Louis Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv03894
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Brazier
Defendant:
East Saint Louis Police Department, K. Randolph, J. McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Neal et al
as 3:2019cv01128
Plaintiff:
Michael L Wilson and Michael Wilson
Defendant:
Sgt D Woods and Ron Neal
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Warden
as 2:2018cv00065
Petitioner:
Jawaun D. Woods
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOODS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2018cv00413
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
JAWAUN D. WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims et al v. Cook County Illinois et al
as 1:2016cv10767
Plaintiff:
Ardamis Darrell Sims, Burundi Antonio Martin, Larry D Woods and others
Defendant:
Cook County Illinois, Thomas Dart, Toni Preckwinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Stroger's Hospital et al
as 1:2016cv09630
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Woods
Defendant:
Stroger's Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Dart
as 1:2016cv08985
Plaintiff:
Antonio D. Woods
Defendant:
Tom J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2014cv02043
Plaintiff:
Jawaun D. Woods
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections and Miami Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2014cv01911
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
JAWAUN D. WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redmond v. Flagg et al
as 3:2009cv00557
Plaintiff:
Anthony Redmond
Defendant:
Julius C Flagg, Jane Tylka, Erickson J Eric and others
Cause Of Action: M
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
