Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Mohammad v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv07742
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, People Of The State Of Illinois, Kimberly Foxx and others
Plaintiff:
Monsour Mohammad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald McDonald v. Cook County, Illinois, et al
as 24-2405
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and KIMBERLY M. FOXX
Plaintiff:
DONALD L. MCDONALD
Foster v. City of Chicago Police et al
as 1:2024cv02920
Plaintiff:
Cortez Foster
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police, Calvin Blunt, Jeffrey Hanssen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujano v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Adam Anthony Lujano
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Edward Villazobos, Dominique Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christmas v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Demond Christmas
Defendant:
J.B. Pritzer, Iris Y. Martinez, Brendan F. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huckleby v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16713
Plaintiff:
Kameron Huckleby
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Jenn McCarty, William Gramboney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donner v. Foxx et al
as 1:2023cv16269
Plaintiff:
Gregory Donner
Defendant:
Kim Foxx
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitmore v. Foxx et al
as 1:2023cv15935
Plaintiff:
James Whitmore
Defendant:
Kimberly M Foxx
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv15741
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee McDonald, Sr
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois and Kimberly M. Foxx
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
